In 2022, Black voters won their case challenging the at-large method of electing Georgia Public Service Commissioners in a historic federal lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State. However, the Secretary of State has taken action to reverse this historic win and voters are at risk of losing their rights AGAIN.
Here’s what you need to know:
On August 5th, 2022, Judge Grimberg ruled that the current method of electing Public Service Commissioners weakened Black voters’ voices, violating the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
The State of Georgia appealed, and Judge Grimberg’s ruling was overturned.
The plaintiffs counter-appealed to the Supreme Court, and the Supreme Court put Judge Grimberg’s original ruling back in place.
As a result, no PSC Commissioners were on the ballot last November.
The Supreme Court then sent the case back to the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals with instructions to review their original overruling of Judge Grimberg’s decision.
We expect a decision to be handed down by the 11th Circuit soon.
About RICHARD ROSE, et al. Plaintiffs, v. BRAD RAFFENSPERGER
The Public Service Commission (PSC) is a body of five elected officials each of who allegedly represent a district. Commissioners must reside in one of the five commission districts to serve as that district’s commissioner. However, despite the presence of districts, commissioners are elected statewide.
Because statewide elections determine who becomes commissioner—and not voters who live in the district—this election method dilutes the voting power of black voters. The result is a chronic lack of representation on the commission, which has been nearly all-white and all-male since 1879. There have only ever been two black Public Service Commissioners. In 1999 Governor Roy Barnes appointed the first, David Burgess. In 2021, Governor Brian Kemp appointed Fitz Johnson to the PSC.
Without proper representation on the commission, black voters in Georgia find themselves at risk of higher rates that they cannot afford and have no voice to express their concerns.
The lawsuit alleges that due to this election structure, the Secretary of State has violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which prohibits voting practices or procedures that discriminate based on race. The lawsuit demands the Secretary of State stop using the at-large method to elect commissioners and choose an election method that empowers voters to elect commissioners that will be responsive to their concerns.
On Friday, August 5th 2022, a federal court ruled that elections for the Georgia Public Service Commission violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act by diluting the votes of Black citizens. The ruling blocks the Secretary of State from holding elections for Public Service Commission Districts 2 and 3 this November. The ruling orders the general assembly to redesign the election but it can no longer use the at-large method. The next election will be scheduled after the state’s remedy is approved by the court. You can read our full statement on the decision by clicking here.
Why representation on the PSC matters
- The PSC oversees and makes critical decisions about electricity, gas, broadband. Most importantly, they regulate Georgia Power. Their decisions impact the cost of utility bills, the sources of the energy that Georgian use, and how pollution from Georgia Power’s power plants is managed.
- Georgia Power has customers in nearly every county in Georgia. So the Public Service Commission makes decisions that impact Georgians all over the state.
- The PSC was established to protect consumers, not utility companies, but the PSC has voted repeatedly to raise rates, add fees, and add charges to the bills of Georgians.
- Georgians now pay the 8th highest electricity bill costs in the nation despite the company’s claim to have the lowest rates.
Did you know that the PSC regulates Plant Vogtle?
Plant Vogtle, the most expensive nuclear power plant ever built, is owned and operated by Georgia Power and Southern Company. Plant Vogtle’s units 3 and 4 are years behind schedule, and the costs have ballooned to $30 billion, more than twice the original estimate. At the same time, they’ve been enormously profitable for Georgia Power— because Georgia Power hasn’t been held responsible for mismanagement and delays. Instead, your Public Service Commissioners have allowed Georgia Power to pass the ever-growing costs of Vogtle onto residential customers, making the people of Georgia pay the bill for their mistakes.
News Coverage
- 2023 June 20 – The Current – U.S. Supreme Court case sheds light on Georgia Public Service Commission voting lawsuit
- 2023 April 5 – Fox 22 News – Black voters urge judge to redraw Georgia’s utility regulator electoral map
- 2022 December 15 – WABE – Federal court holds hearing on Georgia Public Service Commission elections
- 2022 August 19 – The AP – Georgia PSC elections again delayed after high court ruling
- 2022 August 12 – The Current – PSC races return to the November Ballot
- 2022 August 5 – The AP – Judge rules Georgia must end statewide PSC elections
- 2022 June 14 – Georgia Recorder – PSC challenger fights to stay on the ballot after being drawn out of the race – Georgia Recorder
- 2022 June 9 – AJC – Messages reveal alleged effort to draw Democrat out of Georgia PSC district
- 2022 February 16 – Associated Press – Service commission map would bar Democrats challenge
- 2021 July 28 – Georgia Recorder – Feds Side With Black Voters In Suit That Says Rights Violated By At-Large PSC Elections
- 2020 July 15 – Georgia Recorder – Lawsuit charges PSC at-large elections unfair to Black voters
- 2020 July 14 – AJC – Lawsuit: Georgia Public Service Commission elections harm Black voters
Case Documents
- 2022-08-05 Grimberg Decision
- 2022-02-03 Motion for Preliminary Injunction
- 2022-01-24 -097 – Order on motions for Summary Judgment
- 2021-08-30 – 090 – Order setting oral argument on the parties/motions for summary judgment
- 2021-07-28 – 086 – Statement of interest of the United States
- 2021-02-09 Scheduling Order Docket
- 2021-01-05 – 036 – Opinion and order denying the defendant’s otion to dismiss
- 2020-08-27 Response to Motion to Dismiss
- 2020-08-14 – Motion to Dismiss
- 2020-07-14 – Rose v Raffensperger complaint (temp case number)